2. Explanation of criterion:
- Preparation --- how well you prepare that includes when, where you will interview and how you get the people.
- Interview Process --- if your report includes preparation, description, country report (and transcribe), you will get full marks.
- Country Report --- If you don't just copy from the resource and write down the references formally, you will get full marks.
- Interview Questions and Answers --- How well your questions and answers.
- Blog Presentation --- If you complete the whole interview process and your report is clarity and has few errors, you will get full marks.
Name: Lee, Pa Kou
Over view the second interview reports, I find that Lee's report is the best one according to my standard. (However, according to the rule, no transcribe cannot rate highly)
The preparation part and country report part of Lee's report are really great. She tells people how she prepared the second interview in details, for instance, how did she approach people; when, where and how did she contact with the interviewee; and then she also introduces her interviewee. From the preparation, I can feel that Lee worked hard on the interview and it's a good beginning. As reviewing the country report part, I find that a lot of people just copied the information from websites. They didn't use their own words to report the countries, even a lot of people instead of write the references in formal way, and they just put the websites at the end of country report. Lee's country report contains the formal reference and she uses quotation marks when she uses the references. Respecting others work is important to a writer.
From Lee's report, I'm very interesting in the interviewee's answers. Lee focus on the culture of Africa, she asks a lot about religion, wedding, diet and so on. Her interview answers are great, however, in the transcribe part; she seems "forget" writing down her questions. If she can clearly write down her question on the transcribe part, it will be better.
The preparation part and country report part of Lee's report are really great. She tells people how she prepared the second interview in details, for instance, how did she approach people; when, where and how did she contact with the interviewee; and then she also introduces her interviewee. From the preparation, I can feel that Lee worked hard on the interview and it's a good beginning. As reviewing the country report part, I find that a lot of people just copied the information from websites. They didn't use their own words to report the countries, even a lot of people instead of write the references in formal way, and they just put the websites at the end of country report. Lee's country report contains the formal reference and she uses quotation marks when she uses the references. Respecting others work is important to a writer.
From Lee's report, I'm very interesting in the interviewee's answers. Lee focus on the culture of Africa, she asks a lot about religion, wedding, diet and so on. Her interview answers are great, however, in the transcribe part; she seems "forget" writing down her questions. If she can clearly write down her question on the transcribe part, it will be better.
Finally, Lee's second interview report contains the whole parts, which including preparation, description, and country report and transcribe. And she does few errors too.
No comments:
Post a Comment